Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Journal of Vascular Surgery ; 75(6):e208-e209, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1936910

ABSTRACT

Objective: Endovascular popliteal artery aneurysm (PPA) repair has acceptable outcomes compared with open repair for elective therapy. However, endovascular repair for urgent PAA causing acute limb ischemia (ALI) has not been well studied. This project compares the outcomes of urgent endovascular and open repair of PAA presenting with ALI. Methods: The Vascular Quality Initiative database for peripheral vascular interventions and infrainguinal bypass was reviewed for popliteal artery aneurysms presenting with ALI. The characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing urgent open and endovascular repair were compared. Results: Urgent PAA repair for ALI constituted 10.5% (N = 571) of all PAA repairs with no change in proportion during the study period. The majority (80.6%, n = 460) of urgent repairs were open. However, the proportion of endovascular repair significantly increased from 16.7% in 2010 to 85.7% in 2021 with a sharp increase after 2019 (Fig). Patients undergoing endovascular repair were more likely to be African American (3.6% vs 3.3%, P =.044) and older (71.2 ± 12.5 vs 68.0 ± 11.8) than patients undergoing open repair. They were also more likely to have coronary artery disease (32.4% vs 21.7%, P =.006) but less likely to have chronic kidney disease (66.1% vs 69.6%, P =.027) compared with patients undergoing open repair (Table). Open PAA repair was more likely to be associated with bleeding (20.8% vs 2.7%, P <.001), longer postoperative length of stay (8.1 ± 9.3 days vs 4.9 ± 5.6 days, P <.001), and less likelihood of discharge home (64.9% vs 70.3%, P =.051). The perioperative major amputation rate was 7.5% with no difference in major amputations between the two treatment strategies even at 1 year. However, patients receiving endovascular repair had significantly higher inpatient (1.1% vs 0%, P <.001), 30-day (6.3% vs 0.4%, P <.001), and 1-year (16.5% vs 8.4%, P =.02) mortality compared with open repair (Table). Multivariable regression analysis suggested that endovascular repair was independently associated with increased 30-day mortality, but not 1-year mortality compared with open repair. Conclusions: The utilization of endovascular PAA has exponentially increased during the coronavirus pandemic. Even though endovascular repair is associated with decreased complications and resource utilization, it should be offered selectively in the urgent setting for ALI because of concern with perioperative mortality. [Formula presented] [Formula presented]

2.
Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology ; 33(6, Supplement):S129-S130, 2022.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1867441
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL